Classification of threshers
Criteria |
Type |
Description |
Advantage |
Disadvantage |
Feeding type |
Hold-on (or head feed) |
Only the panicle is fed into the machine |
Straw remains intact |
Lower throughput Complex machine |
Feed-in |
The hole crop is fed into the machine |
Higher throughput |
Clogging with very wet or long straw. Higher power requirement |
|
Crop flow |
Axial-flow |
Whole crop moves axially around the drum periphery |
Low weight Does not need straw separators Good performance with wet crop Can be used for Basmati rice |
Higher power requirement |
Conventional |
Crop flows tangentially through gap between drum and concave |
Lower power requirement Concave clearance easy to set |
Needs straw walker for separating grains from straw Problems in wet crop Causes high breakage in Basmati rice |
|
Threshing elements |
Pegteeth |
Rows of peg teeth attached to threshing drum Typical axial flow thresher drum |
Grinds up the straw Performs well with wet straw Simple design Cheap |
|
Rasp bar |
Rasp bars attached to threshing drum, usually used in tangential flow threshers |
Lower power requirement |
Problems with wet straw. |
|
Wire loop |
Typically used in hold-on threshers and head feed combines |
Lowest power requirement Thin wire loops comb grain and thresh through impact |
Wears quicker |